IN DEVELOPMENT a structured reasoning system that evaluates claims, decisions, and complex questions through formal argumentation rather than unconstrained generation. It assembles domain-relevant expert perspectives, constructs explicit arguments grounded in established argumentation theory, systematically identifies conflicts and attacks between those arguments, and then computes which positions survive formal scrutiny — producing conclusions with full transparency into why each claim was accepted, rejected, or left unresolved. The result is AI-assisted analysis where every conclusion traces back to named arguments, typed attacks, and documented evidence, making the reasoning auditable, challengeable, and improvable rather than opaque.